首页> 外文OA文献 >The Collective Origins of Toxic Air Pollution: Implications for Greenhouse Gas Trading and Toxic Hotspots
【2h】

The Collective Origins of Toxic Air Pollution: Implications for Greenhouse Gas Trading and Toxic Hotspots

机译:有毒空气污染的集体起源:对温室气体交易和有毒热点的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This Article presents the first synthesis of geospatial data on toxic air pollution in the United States. Contrary to conventional views, the data show that vehicles and small stationary sources emit a majority of the air toxics nationally. Industrial sources, by contrast, rarely account for more than ten percent of cumulative cancer risks from all outdoor sources of air toxics. This pattern spans multiple spatial scales, ranging from census tracts to the nation as a whole. However, it is most pronounced in metropolitan areas, which have the lowest air quality and are home to eighty percent of the U.S. population.The secondary status of industrial facilities as sources of air toxics has important implications for the current debate over cap-and-trade regulation—the policy instrument of choice for controlling greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions responsible for climate change. Environmental justice advocates have opposed GHG trading in significant part because it could exacerbate inequitable exposures to toxic co-pollutants, not GHGs themselves, in minority and low-income communities.The likelihood of such disparities occurring has remained an open empirical question. The geospatial data reveal that, apart from a few readily identifiable census tracts, the potential for GHG trading to cause toxic hotspots is extremely low. Moreover, for the few jurisdictions in which disparities cannot be ruled out, targeted policies exist to prevent them without compromising market efficiency.
机译:本文介绍了美国有毒空气污染的地理空间数据的首次综合。与传统观点相反,数据表明,车辆和小型固定源在全国范围内排放大部分空气中的有毒物质。相比之下,工业来源很少占室外所有空气中毒物累积癌症风险的百分之十以上。这种模式跨越多个空间尺度,从人口普查区到整个国家。但是,这在空气质量最低,占美国人口80%的大都市地区最为明显。作为空气有毒物质来源的工业设施的次要地位对当前有关碳排放总量控制的辩论具有重要意义。贸易法规-控制气候变化的温室气体(GHG)排放的首选政策工具。倡导环境正义的人士在很大程度上反对温室气体交易,因为这可能加剧少数族裔和低收入社区中有毒污染物(而不是温室气体本身)的不公平暴露,发生这种差异的可能性仍然是一个开放的经验性问题。地理空间数据显示,除了一些易于确定的普查区域外,温室气体交易造成有毒热点的可能性非常低。此外,对于无法排除差异的少数司法管辖区,存在有针对性的政策可以在不影响市场效率的情况下加以防止。

著录项

  • 作者

    Adelman, David E;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号